Private Equity Bro
£0.00 0

Basket

No products in the basket.

Why the “Second Request” Matters in U.S. Antitrust M&A

Private Equity Bro Avatar

If you’ve worked on a deal that ran into a Second Request, you know it’s not a minor hurdle — it’s a major detour. The Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Second Request isn’t just another legal step. It can delay closings, inflate costs, and in some cases, unwind the economics of a transaction.

Issued by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) or the Department of Justice (DOJ), Second Requests are rare — appearing in roughly 1.6% to 4% of reportable M&A filings—but their consequences ripple well beyond that narrow band. For private equity professionals, M&A advisors, and deal counsel, understanding their implications and preparing accordingly is a necessary discipline.

What Is a Second Request?

Under the HSR Act, qualifying M&A transactions must be reported to the FTC and DOJ before closing. That initiates a standard 30-day waiting period. If an agency identifies potential competition concerns during this time, it may issue a Request for Additional Information — a “Second Request” — which pauses the review and triggers a much deeper round of scrutiny.

The Mechanics:

  • Halts the statutory waiting period.
  • Requires comprehensive production of internal documentation.
  • Often spans thousands of files across departments and systems.

It introduces execution risk, shifts timelines, and forces deal teams to pivot fast and work smarater.

Frequency and Trends

While only 47 Second Requests were issued in 2022, the denominator matters. With over 3,000 HSR-reportable deals filed that year, the proportion dipped to 1.6%, according to Morgan Lewis.

Source: EDRM

But that’s only part of the story:

  • 2022 marked one of the busiest years for M&A volume in two decades.
  • By early 2024, some firms were already handling as many Second Requests as they did in all of 2023.

The trend is clear: regulatory scrutiny is intensifying, and it’s not slowing down.

Why It Alters Deal Dynamics

Operational Demands:

  • Compressed compliance timelines (typically 30 days)
  • Cross-functional coordination across business units
  • Voluminous discovery efforts that can total millions of documents

Financial Exposure:

  • Legal and vendor costs easily run into seven figures
  • Added complexity can lead to renegotiation or repricing
  • Bridge or committed financing can come under pressure

Strategic Friction:

  • Integration plans stall
  • Competing bidders may exploit timing gaps
  • PE-backed deals may miss critical exit windows

These aren’t theoretical. They’re very real pressures every deal team should plan for.

Typical Scope of a Second Request

Second Requests are highly customized, reflecting the transaction’s specific antitrust concerns. Here’s a representative look:

CategoryExample Materials
FinancialsBudget models, growth forecasts, historical margins
Strategic DocsBoard presentations, synergy analyses, competitor assessments
Market InformationShare estimates, pricing data, customer concentration
Sales DataSKUs, channel breakdowns, customer-level trends
OperationsManufacturing flows, logistics planning, supply contracts

Agencies use this information to assess whether the deal would substantially lessen competition in any defined market.

Responding: The Compliance Lift

Managing a Second Request requires coordinated legal, operational, and technological resources under tight deadlines.

Core Steps:

  • Identify custodians and relevant systems
  • Preserve and collect responsive data
  • Review for privilege and redact sensitive materials

Organizations with mature information governance frameworks have a measurable advantage. In contrast, decentralized or ad hoc processes risk delays and errors that frustrate regulators and prolong timelines.

Compliance Timeline (Illustrative)

Day 0     → Second Request issued
Day 3–5   → Internal scoping, legal hold issued
Day 5–15  → Custodian interviews, data mapping, kickoff with vendors
Day 10–25 → Document review, redactions, QC
Day 30    → Certify substantial compliance

Even with best practices, it’s a heavy lift.

Regulatory Shifts in 2024

Recent updates in antitrust enforcement policy are increasing the likelihood and scope of Second Requests.

Key Developments:

  • Revised Merger Guidelines with more focus on labor and vertical market impacts.
  • More aggressive review of partial acquisitions and serial transactions.
  • Expanded data preservation requirements, including messaging apps, collaboration tools, and mobile content.

As Cimplifi notes, time and quality expectations have moved in opposite directions: the clock is shorter, and the bar is higher.

Implications for Deal Structuring

Antitrust risk now factors into not just regulatory timelines—but into how deals are priced and papered.

Deal Term Adjustments:

  • Provisions allocating cost of Second Request compliance
  • Walk rights tied to prolonged agency review
  • Antitrust-specific outside dates or extensions

Structural Considerations:

  • Carve-outs and pre-deal restructuring to mitigate overlap
  • Parallel paths for voluntary divestitures or remedy discussions
  • Front-loading clean teams and third-party validators to support submissions

In highly competitive auction environments, bidders able to absorb or mitigate Second Request risk gain an edge.

Practical Strategies: Managing the Process

Get Counsel Involved Early

Experienced antitrust lawyers can flag red flags pre-signing, offer structuring guidance, and open informal dialogue with agencies when appropriate.

Build a Coordinated Response Team

Team FunctionRole in Process
LegalOwns strategy and interface with regulators
Business UnitsProvide documentation, commercial context
IT/Data GovernanceIdentify systems, manage preservation
External VendorsReview platforms, hosting, analytics

A clear playbook saves time — and stress.

Leverage Technology Thoughtfully

  • AI-assisted document review can reduce manual burden
  • Project management tools support timeline discipline
  • Secure data rooms help control document access and sharing

These tools help, but they don’t replace the need for skilled execution.

What Sophisticated Deal Teams Are Watching

For deals that clear HSR thresholds, savvy teams:

  • Budget time for the full investigative cycle
  • Model cost and delay risk into offer pricing
  • Avoid overconfidence based on historical clearance rates

2024 is shaping up to be a year of more scrutiny and longer timelines. Treat Second Request planning as core to deal execution, not an afterthought.

Conclusion

A Second Request doesn’t just ask questions — it tests a deal’s foundations. It’s a regulatory process, yes, but also a strategic hurdle. For finance professionals, treating it with the same seriousness as capital structure or diligence is no longer optional.

Preparation and professionalism make the difference between delay and derailment.

P.S. – Explore our Premium Resources for more valuable content and tools to help you break into the industry.

Sources

 

Share this:

Related Articles

Explore our Best Sellers

© 2026 Private Equity Bro. All rights reserved.