A Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC) is a shell corporation that raises capital through an IPO with a clear promise: “Give us your money, and we’ll find something interesting to buy.” It’s a straightforward but unusual setup. Investors provide funds to a team that, at the time of the IPO, has not yet selected a target company to acquire.
Mechanically, investors buy units—usually one share plus a fraction of a warrant—without knowing the target. Once public, the SPAC’s management (the sponsors) has 18 to 24 months to identify and close a deal. If they miss this window, the SPAC liquidates and returns the cash to public shareholders.
This inverts the usual approach to raising capital. Instead of companies seeking funds for specific ambitions, capital is actively searching for a company. The effects of this inversion play out in several unique ways within the SPAC process.
Following the IPO, the SPAC places its proceeds, minus underwriting fees, into an interest-bearing trust account. This trust provides both the funding for the future acquisition and a redemption mechanism for public shareholders wary of the proposed merger.
This setup gives rise to a “SPAC put option”: shareholders can force the SPAC to buy back their shares at about $10 if they disapprove of the merger. This feature offers a safety net for investors, but it can also influence their behavior around mergers.
Sponsors typically invest only a token amount (often about $25,000) for “founder shares” that translate into roughly 20% of the post-IPO equity. These shares act as compensation for tasks like deal sourcing, due diligence, and transaction structuring. If the SPAC closes a merger, sponsors stand to earn significant profits, even if public investors themselves do not fare as well.
For instance, in a $300 million SPAC, a sponsor’s $25,000 could yield 20% ownership if a deal goes through, giving them a remarkable return even on a mediocre deal. The incentives here are clear – tilting in favor of sponsors.
To bridge valuation gaps or fund growth, SPACs often use Private Investment in Public Equity (PIPE) financing. PIPE investors commit money when the merger is announced, offering additional funds and reducing the risk that too many public investors redeem their shares.
PIPE deals act as signals of confidence: if institutional investors participate, it could suggest the deal has merit. However, PIPE investors often receive more favorable terms than those offered to the public, adding another level of complexity.
Sponsors value SPACs because these vehicles allow for faster public listings compared to traditional IPOs. While a standard IPO can take six to twelve months and exposes companies to volatile market conditions, a SPAC merger can complete within three to four months after a target is chosen.
Additionally, sponsors control deal terms by negotiating directly with target management. The absence of the traditional “bookbuilding” process sidesteps some uncertainty around pricing but can leave less time for deep risk assessment.
Pressure to close a deal before the deadline means sponsors are sometimes motivated to complete any deal, regardless of whether it is optimal for shareholders. If no deal is made, sponsors risk losing their equity “promote.”
Dilution represents a significant consideration for investors. By the time of merger, dilution from underwriting fees, sponsor incentives, and warrants can reduce the money delivered to the target from, for example, $300 million to only about $210–225 million.
Warrants further cap the upside for ordinary shareholders while benefiting warrant holders. When modeling SPAC investments, it is important to carefully account for these sources of dilution.
The SPAC market experienced a classic surge and slowdown. Over 600 SPAC IPOs raised more than $200 billion during the 2020–21 peak, but activity slowed in 2022 due to regulatory attention and lackluster post-merger performance.
As of mid-2024:
Remaining SPACs increasingly focus on specific sectors such as climate tech, fintech, and healthcare. However, 60–70% of public shares are typically redeemed before mergers, which means merged companies often receive less funding than planned.
This cycle of high redemptions discourages institutional investors, which in turn leads to further redemptions. Solutions may involve updated sponsor criteria or realignment of incentives.
SPACs underperform other methods of going public. Looking at median one-year post-completion returns:
Performance reflects the influence of sponsor incentives and high redemption rates, which can reduce the capital available to support long-term growth. Yet, a few high-profile SPAC merges such as those involving Lucid Motors and Grab have performed well, illustrating the importance of sector focus and leadership.
The SEC has responded to SPAC-specific issues by requiring:
Further SEC proposals target methods of calculating diluted earnings per share as well as sponsor compensation. These changes are designed to improve transparency and better inform investors about key risks and deal structures.
SPAC investing requires additional scrutiny. Compared to lengthy IPO vetting, SPAC mergers often leave a narrower window for risk assessment and analysis.
Core areas to focus on:
| Focus Area | Key Questions | Valuation Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Sponsor Track Record | Have previous SPACs succeeded? What industry experience does the sponsor bring? | Influences risk profile and deal confidence |
| Redemption Risk | What are redemption trends in similar deals? | Determines amount of post-merger cash |
| Target Representations | What protections or indemnities are provided? | Affects post-closing risks |
| Warrant Treatment | Are warrants valued fairly and accounted for properly? | Impacts reported earnings and volatility |
SPAC investors must rapidly evaluate available data and disclosures, as periods for due diligence are sometimes short.
The response to SPAC challenges has included several modifications:
Special Purpose Acquisition Rights Company (SPARC):
De-risked SPACs:
Industry-focused SPACs:
Though investor appetite for less dilutive models is apparent, the market is still adjusting and the long-term implications remain to be seen.
Looking toward the next several years, there are three prominent possibilities for how the SPAC market could develop:
1. Focused Consolidation: Sector specialists and experienced sponsors drive most activity, with consolidation around best practices and targeted industries. The market becomes smaller but more resilient as a result.
2. Structural Reform: Regulators and exchanges implement new rules to address dilution, align incentives, or redefine sponsor compensation structures. Higher transparency and aligned incentives could improve outcomes for public investors.
3. Gradual Decline: SPAC use continues but at much lower volumes, with only exceptional sponsors and unique situations favoring the approach. Other methods for going public, such as direct listings or traditional IPOs, regain dominance.
Investors evaluating SPAC opportunities should look for sponsors with a successful track record, low anticipated redemption rates, and a clear industry focus. Detailed due diligence and careful modeling of dilution are essential for making sound investment decisions.
SPACs remain a distinctive avenue to public markets, offering speed and flexibility at the cost of unique risks and dilution. Investors and sponsors alike must manage complex structures, from trust accounts and promote economics to PIPE financing and redemption dynamics. Recent regulatory measures and market innovations aim to sharpen alignment of incentives and improve transparency.
Whether the SPAC market consolidates around specialized sponsors, undergoes structural reform, or recedes in favor of traditional IPOs and direct listings, thorough due diligence and clear-eyed valuation will be critical. As SPACs evolve, those who anticipate shifts in governance, compensation, and investor protections will be best positioned to harness their potential.
P.S. – Check out our Premium Resources for more valuable content and tools to help you break into the industry.
